What changed
New Sonnet-tier model replacing Claude Sonnet 5 as the latest Sonnet. Terminal-Bench 4.0 score jumps from 10.3% (Sonnet 5) to 70.6%, exceeding Opus 5.5's 66.4%. Minimum cacheable prompt drops from 1,024 to 512 tokens.
TL;DR
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores 70.6% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (beating Opus 5.5's 66.4%), 81.3% on SWE-Bench Pro, and 55.5% on CursorBench at $2/$10 per MTok — same price as Sonnet 5, 30%+ faster output, 30% fewer tokens per task.
Developer signal
The most striking thing about Sonnet 5.5's benchmarks is the Terminal-Bench number: the Sonnet tier now leads the Claude family on the coding benchmark that directly measures terminal/shell operations — the thing coding agents actually do. This is the first Sonnet model Anthropic describes as having cybersecurity safeguards comparable to Opus 5.5. Practically: if you're choosing between Sonnet 5.5 and Opus 5.5 for a coding agent, Sonnet 5.5 is now the default choice on both performance and cost grounds for most workloads. The 30% speed improvement also materially improves latency for streaming use cases. The effort recalibration means you should re-run your effort sweep — the same effort level does not produce the same thinking depth as it did on Sonnet 5. Start at high for agentic coding and hard tasks, medium for simpler ones. The 512-token minimum cache write (down from 1,024) means short prompt patterns that previously couldn't leverage caching now can.
| Benchmark | Sonnet 5.5 | Sonnet 5 | Opus 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0 | 70.6% | 10.3% | 66.4% |
| FrontierCode 1.1 | 46.2% | 42.4% | 54.4% |
| CursorBench 4.0 | 55.5% | 34.1% | 57.8% |
| GDPval-AA v2.1 | 1844 | 1449 | 1846 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 64.5% | 54.9% | 67.7% |
| OSWorld 2.1 | 80.1% | 57.0% | 81.8% |
| SWE-Bench Pro | 81.3% | — | — |
Knowledge cutoff: June 2026. Context: 1M tokens. Max output: 128K tokens (300K on Batch API with beta header).